Skip to content
Research-fluent · Funder-aware · Documented handover

Digital deliverables for grant-funded research. Documented, on deadline, ready for handover.

Reports, dashboards, research tools, and ML deployments — built around your work packages, your funders, your timeline. We deliver, you stay in the science.

We read your project from day one — work packages, evaluator expectations, FAIR data, closeout milestones. Research data management without hiring a data manager.

Free, no commitment. We'll reply within 2 business days.

Recent delivery

FIG. 01

Alzheimer’s brain connectivity

Functional connectivity comparison across 5 clinical stages from the ADNI cohort — resting-state fMRI, reproducible pipeline.

Mean cross-correlation · 6 RSNs

ADNI · n = 116

DMN
EXEC
VIS
AUD
SAL
MOT
CN
AD

DMN + salience reductions in AD · sensorimotor preserved.

They understood the grant context from day one — we didn't have to explain how research projects work.

Research Programme Lead, EU-funded consortium

Project highlights

ADNI cohort · resting-state fMRI
SPM12 + rsHRF preprocessing
NSP networks · 5 clinical groups
Group statistics + ML stratification

Trusted by research teams, foundations, health institutions, and public-sector partners

EU-funded consortiaUniversity research groupsPublic health institutionsMission-driven foundations

15+

research delivery projects

6

countries served

100%

delivered on agreed timelines

Across completed delivery projects to date

A REAL DELIVERABLE

From raw data to evaluator-ready delivery.
In weeks, not quarters.

PROMISE: She Wins · EU-funded sports evaluation programme. The actual deliverable bundle we shipped — mobile app, cross-country analysis, evaluator-ready outputs.

PW

PROMISE: She Wins

EU-FUNDED · 6 COUNTRIES · 148 PARTICIPANTS

DELIVERABLE 01 · MOBILE APP
PROMISE app — welcome screen
PROMISE app — quiz results screen

17-question self-assessment · 6 dimensions

DELIVERABLE 02 · DATA PIPELINE

Pre / post test · 6 federations

n = 148

ESP
ITA
FRA
GRE
POR
BUL
Pre
Post

Mean score · 6 dimensions

avg %

Roles
83
Resour
78
Power
68
Voice
72
Decis
70
Reconc
75

Pre / post analysis · 32 focus groups

DELIVERABLE 03 · OUTCOMES

Technical sections of the final project report

arXiv-ready draft

Slide-deck presentation for European committee

HANDOVER · APP + DATA + DOCUMENTATIONFIG. 01 · DELIVERED
01

Who We Help

We work with teams that have the research vision — but not the engineering capacity to deliver the digital outputs they need.

01

Research Groups and University Teams

Labs and university teams needing data work, research tools, dashboards, or project sites — delivered alongside active research.

02

Philanthropic Organisations

Foundations and nonprofits delivering funded programmes — and needing the digital infrastructure to show donors what their money built.

03

Health & Life Sciences

Health and clinical teams needing research dashboards, data pipelines, and ML deployment with proper oversight.

04

Governments & Public Agencies

Public bodies that need to show citizens and oversight committees what programme money produced — clearly, in documented digital form.

02

When Teams Bring Us In

These are the situations we see over and over. If any sound familiar, we can help.

01

Your PhD students are best at research, not engineering — they don't have time to build the platform

02

You tried working with an agency but they didn't understand your grant context or deliverable format

03

Your university RSE team is overbooked and can't take on your project

04

You have a REDCap, Shiny, or Streamlit prototype that needs to become a production research tool

05

The reporting deadline is approaching, project closeout is around the corner, and the digital deliverables aren't ready

03

What We Deliver

Grant consultancies promise — they don't build. Generic agencies build the wrong thing. We bridge the gap: research data management, grant closeout, research tool development, MLOps for research teams. Documented, on deadline.

2–4 weeks

Data-to-Report Sprint

From raw or fragmented data to research data analysis, visualisation, and reporting-ready outputs — built around what funders and evaluators expect.

Reports your funder accepts on first review — no rework, no late-night reformatting.

Who it's for

Research teams and grant-funded projects that need a fast, structured research data reporting workflow without building internal analytics capacity.

Deliverables

  • Data cleaning and structuring — so your team can focus on interpretation, not wrangling
  • Analysis tables, charts, and visual outputs — ready for reports and presentations
  • Reporting-ready summary deck or document assets — formatted for stakeholders
3–6 weeks

Grant Digital Closeout Pack

Final digital deliverables — bundled, evaluator-ready, fully handed over. Covers the closeout work most teams underestimate until the last quarter.

Closeout signed off — funder satisfied, deliverables archived, your team unblocked.

Who it's for

Grant-funded teams approaching reporting deadlines, closeout milestones, or consortium handover requirements.

Deliverables

  • Data sprint and reporting assets — evidence of impact, clearly presented
  • Lightweight website, dashboard, or project tool — visible outputs for stakeholders
  • Documentation, guides, and handover pack — so the project continues after you
4–10 weeks

Research Tool MVP

Research tool development for web or mobile — built around how your team actually works in the field, in the lab, or at the desk. Dashboards, field-data capture, and lightweight research apps shipped in weeks.

A working tool that serves the research — not a product roadmap that outlives the grant.

Who it's for

Research groups, pilots, and institutional teams that need a fit-for-purpose tool without launching a full software product programme.

Deliverables

  • Workflow mapping and scoped feature set — built around how your team actually works
  • Responsive web app or mobile-first tool — usable in the field or office
  • Admin logic, documentation, and implementation handover — so your team can run it confidently
4–8 weeks

MLOps for Research Teams

Validated models from notebook to production. Stable deployment, monitoring, and human-review routing — sized for a research team, not a hyperscale platform org.

A stable operational deployment with clear documentation — not experimental code.

Who it's for

Institutions that already have a validated model or evaluation logic and need a stable operational deployment rather than experimental code.

Deliverables

  • Deployment pipeline and inference workflow — production-grade, not prototype
  • Monitoring, fallback logic, or human review routing — so edge cases don't become crises
  • Technical documentation and operational handover — for internal continuity
04

How We Work

Your team stays focused on the research. We handle the digital outputs.

01

Review

We review your grant specifications, project requirements, and delivery obligations — so the scope is anchored in what your funder will actually evaluate, not what looks impressive in a brochure.

You provide

Share your grant specs, project brief, and any existing materials or data.

02

Scope

We define the work precisely — no inflated roadmap, no unnecessary build. Just the outputs required to deliver well and on time.

You provide

Confirm priorities, timeline constraints, and stakeholder requirements.

03

Deliver

We build, document, and hand over the final outputs with the structure your team needs to use them confidently after delivery.

You provide

Review milestones and provide feedback. We handle the rest.

Deadline-awareFAIR-aligned documentationClear handoverMinimal management overhead
05

Flexible Ways to Start

You don't need to commit to a full project to begin. Choose the entry point that fits your situation.

Scope Review

A practical assessment of your delivery needs, timeline, and fit. No commitment — just clarity on what's possible.

Best for

Teams exploring options or unclear on exact requirements

Pilot Scope

A smaller initial work package to validate fit and delivery approach before committing to a larger engagement.

Best for

New relationships or projects with uncertainty

Best fit for most projects

Phased Delivery

Break larger projects into defined phases with clear milestones, reducing risk and improving budget visibility.

Best for

Larger or longer-term delivery needs

Multi-Project Retainer

Continuous-engagement retainer for institutions juggling 5+ active grant-funded projects. Multi-year commitment, dedicated capacity, predictable annual cost. Most teams don't need this — Phased Delivery covers single-project depth at a fraction of the cost.

Best for

Research institutions with continuous multi-grant pipelines

All engagements include documentation and structured handover as standard.

Request a Scope Review

Most teams start here

06

Delivery Examples

Real digital delivery work built for research and mission-driven contexts. Outcomes, not just outputs.

CASE 01EU-funded sports evaluation programme
6 countries, 148 participants, pre/post-test analysis delivered

PROMISE: She Wins

Mobile assessment tool, cross-country analysis, and reporting assets developed for an EU-funded consortium of 6 European basketball federations.

Consistent evaluation data across 6 European federations — grant obligations met.

Mobile self-assessment app: PROMISE Quiz17-question assessment model across 6 dimensionsPre/post-test analysis: 148 participants, 32 focus groups, 6 countries+2
CASE 02Research assessment workflow tool
Automated pipeline with human oversight routing

CoARA: Narrative CV Evaluation Pipeline

AI-assisted evaluation pipeline for researcher narrative CVs, designed to support structured review in line with CoARA principles.

Systematic, transparent evaluation workflow — clearer feedback, CoARA-aligned practices.

AI-assisted pipeline for narrative CV evaluationCV intake, preprocessing, and level classificationDual-track evaluation: category-tuned + general baseline+2
CASE 03Multi-site neuroimaging research collaboration · ADNI
422 ADNI subjects · 5 diagnostic groups · raw BOLD to publication figures

Neurodegenerative fMRI Full Data Analysis Pipeline

Full functional-connectivity analysis pipeline for a research group in Barcelona working on Alzheimer's disease, integrating ADNI fMRI and clinical phenotypes across 422 subjects spanning cognitively normal, MCI (early/late), and Alzheimer's groups.

A versioned analysis stack that takes raw fMRI to publication-ready figures — re-runnable as the cohort grows.

End-to-end fMRI analysis pipeline (Python + MATLAB)ADNI cohort integration: 422 subjects across CN / EMCI / LMCI / MCI / ADEigenmode network analysis (NSP) + rsHRF deconvolution + oscillatory dynamics+2
07

What we really needed was to stop worrying about data packaging and reports, and focus on the research. They got our project context from day one and delivered exactly what our funder wanted — without us being in five Zoom calls a week.

Research Programme Lead

EU-funded consortium (6 countries, 32 focus groups)

08

Why Teams Choose Pragma

We're not a generic dev agency. We're not a strategy consultancy. We build the things your grant promised.

01

Grant-Literate

We read your Annex 1, understand work packages, and know what evaluators expect from digital deliverables. No translation layer needed.

02

Execution-First

Strategy consultancies advise. We ship. Working platforms, documented pipelines, and handover packs — not slide decks.

03

EOSC & FAIR Aligned

Your outputs are built for open science: schema-aligned metadata, reproducible pipelines, and archival-ready documentation.

04

No HR Overhead

No salary negotiations, no university pay scales, no short-term contracts. One subcontract, clear deliverables, done.

09

Is Pragma the Right Fit?

We work best with funded projects that have specific digital outputs to deliver.

Good Fit

  • You have a Horizon Europe, ERC, MSCA, national, or foundation-funded project with digital deliverables in the work plan
  • Your team is non-technical or your RSE group is at capacity
  • You need outputs that satisfy evaluators — not a prototype that lives on a PhD student's laptop
  • Your timeline and budget for external services are defined

Probably Not a Fit

  • Your scope is unclear or not defined
  • The digital work is basic enough for REDCap or Google Forms (we'll tell you honestly)
10

Common Questions

What teams usually ask before they get in touch.

Yes — research data management covers the full lifecycle: collection, structuring, analysis, reporting, and archival handover. We handle the implementation side — data cleaning, FAIR-aligned pipelines, and the digital deliverables your funder reviews at closeout.
Our Grant Digital Closeout Pack bundles the digital deliverables that tend to slip in the last quarter — data sprints, dashboards, reporting assets, and the documentation your funder needs. Most teams come to us 6–10 weeks before deadline; we deliver in 3–6, evaluator-ready.
11

Request a Scope Review

Share your project context, timeline, and delivery needs. We'll assess fit and reply within 2 business days. Confidential — NDA on request.

Reply within 2 business days
No commitment required

What happens next: We'll review your submission, assess fit and scope, and reply with either a scope proposal, clarifying questions, or — if we're not the right fit — a recommendation of who is.

Your information is confidential. We never share project details without permission.

Prefer email?info@pragma-dl.com
Or WhatsApp:+34 633 489 165